Polemika s protiargumenty Iva Jiráska vůči třem nejčastějším zdůvodněním amorálnosti "dopingu"

Autoři

MOUDR Vratislav

Rok publikování 2018
Druh Článek v odborném periodiku
Časopis / Zdroj Filosofický casopis
Fakulta / Pracoviště MU

Fakulta sportovních studií

Citace
www https://kramerius.lib.cas.cz/search/i.jsp?pid=uuid:f6be3e92-48e1-11e1-5015-001143e3f55c#periodical-periodicalvolume-periodicalitem-article_uuid:f1a1c875-7d7a-45f7-bdf1-851209ff7ea2
Klíčová slova doping; performance-enhancing substances; ethics; moral reasoning; Ivo Jirasek; Robert L. Simo
Popis Ivo Jirasek, in the chapter "Doping" of his monography Philosophical Kinanthropology: The Meeting Point of Philosophy, Body and Movement (Filosoficka kinantropologie: setkani filosofie, tela, a pohybu; Olomouc 2005), attempts to challenge three arguments most frequently put forward in justification of the appropriateness of banning certain substances used by some athletes to enhance their performance. Jirasek treats as invalid the argument that says performance-enhancing substances are harmful for the user, as this conflicts with a liberal emphasis on individual freedom. Apparently, the argument that the doping of some leads to the doping of others is also insufficient, because we would be denying free will to individuals and assuming that their behaviour is always conformist. It is also not enough to condemn doping as deceptive and unfair conduct, because then all other means by which athletes enhance their performance would have to be eliminated. The aim is to demonstrate the unsustainability of Jirasek's arguments against these three frequent justifications.

Používáte starou verzi internetového prohlížeče. Doporučujeme aktualizovat Váš prohlížeč na nejnovější verzi.

Další info